WRITING
HOME
A Creative Writing Project
for California History
by Rose
Owens
This writing project will be
based upon the information contained in “Diversity in the Gold Rush Era” (which
is included with this lesson plan),
as well as other information about the Gold Rush period. This project should follow a study
and discussion of life in the mining camps, including discussion of minority
groups.
Each student will chose a person to be. (Possible choices are men, women, or
children who are Chinese, French, Black, American, etc.) The student will then write a letter
home from the gold field as if he or she were that person. Students will need to do
some research about the country or area of the United
States where they are sending their letters in order to be able to compare California to the place they
came from. They will create a name
and an address for the person they are writing to.
The letter home should
describe an “event” written in the first person. (This may be an ordinary description of
life during the time.) It
could also include some of the following information:
1.
Contrast life in California
with life at home. (climate,
seasons, living conditions)
2.
Describe your mining
camp. (where located, mining rules,
types of mining)
3.
What is the name of your
camp?
4.
What success are you
having?
5.
What is hard about mining
(or whatever else you are doing to make money)?
6.
What do you like about
California?
7.
Other details (clothes worn,
foods eaten, games, hobbies and leisure time activities , household duties, living
conditions, transportation).
8.
Identify your relationship
to the person you are writing to in some way (friend, parent, brother or sister,
other relative)
Further research could be involved to discover if envelopes were
used. How were letters sealed? What type of postage was used?
Provide a mail sack for
students to put their finished letters in.
This mail sack will be carried to San Francisco by mule and then the
letters will be put on a boat to travel to their destinations. After all letters have been “mailed”,
share each student’s letter.
Copyright 1997 by Rose Owens
Diversity in the Gold Rush
Era
by Rose
Owens
GOLD! It was a magic word,
an exciting word. The discovery of
gold on Jan. 24, 1848 changed California history. “Gold! There’s gold on the American River!”
cried Samuel Brannon as he ran down
the street in San Francisco, waving a quinine bottle with gold flakes in
it. There were about 900 people in
San Francisco at that time.
Most of those 900 people were white American males. By summer there were only 100 people in
San Francisco—everyone else had “headed for the hills to strike it rich.” During the summer of 1848, the only gold
miners in California were people who had been in California at the time gold was
discovered. Therefore most of
the gold miners were white.
The atmosphere in the mining camps was friendly in the summer of
1848. There was little crime or
fighting. Men carried either a
pistol or a bowie knife or both but didn’t use them to settle arguments. Miners might have an argument but if
they couldn’t settle it, they appealed to another miner to arbitrate for
them. Theft was unknown. There was plenty of gold for everyone—it
was lying all over the place. If a
miner didn’t strike it rich in one spot, there were plenty of other places to
try.
[The miners were] homogeneous—an important
point. A few of the so-called Old
Californians, the ones of mixed descent, tried their hands in the diggings, but
not many, and those who did try it soon pulled out. The Mexicans themselves, those from Mexico, some of them experienced
miners, had not yet put in an appearance.
Those who toiled in the foothills that summer of 1848 were of all ages
and all walks of life, but they were Americans almost to a man, and they were of
one color. . . . Another
explanation for the amazing absence of crime lay in the fact that these men were
devoted to their jobs. . . When the
sun set they were too muscle-weary to indulge in any pranks. (Chidsey, p. 41).
By early 1849 dramatic
changes had occurred. The news had
spread to the East Coast, to South America, to Australia, to Europe. People
rushed to California from all over the world for a variety of reasons. In France, Italy, Germany, Hungary and
Rumania there were political uprisings, unemployment, and food shortages. These conditions caused people to view
California as a land of opportunity.
Forty-niners came pouring into California across the continent and by
boat. They believed gold
would be their ticket to a better, richer life. There was gold in California! Anything seemed
possible!
This new influx of
forty-niners caused problems. The
miners began to fear that there wouldn’t be enough gold for everyone. They contrived rules that taxed foreign
miners. Foreign miners were only
allowed to mine the claims that had already been worked over. Some foreigners were forcibly driven
out.
The rush to the gold field created or revealed selfish people who wanted
to get there first so they could get the most gold. It was not uncommon to find food,
clothing and other necessities abandoned beside the trail in order to lighten
the oxen’s load. These supplies
were often destroyed to prevent their use by someone else who might use the
supplies to get to California first.
John Borthwick noticed that men coming from the East across the Isthmus
of Panama were “rude, argumentative, and complaining. . . and they did nothing
to help each other. . . Those
returning from California were thoughtful of their fellow travelers and willing
to put up with any inconvenience for the good of all.” (Heritage, p. 109-110) This change in the people
who came to California was rather startling. The difficult journey to
California—whether by land or by sea—seems to have enabled the miners to learn
compassion. Perhaps seeing death
and overcoming hardship helped them to understand how vulnerable they
individually were. The selfish
travelers became kinder miners.
One of the heart-warming things about the gold
rush days was the willingness of most men to help each other. . . . A very down-at-the-mouth young
man appeared at a place where some
thirty miners were working. The men
looked the stranger over, and asked him why he was so dejected. He had had nothing but bad luck, the
young man explained; the claims he had staked all turned out to be worthless,
and he was ready to quit and go home.
One miner spoke up: “Boys, I’ll work an hour for
that chap yonder if you will.” And
they did. At the end of the hour
they turned over about $100 in gold dust to him, and gave him a list of tools,
telling him to come back when he had bought them. “We’ll stake a good claim for you, and
after that you’ll paddle your own canoe.”
(American Heritage, p. 109)
According to the laws the miners developed, a man could stake a claim and
it was his as long as he worked it at least one day a week. (How often the claim must be worked
varied from town to town, but one day a week was typical.) Cholera, dysentery, scurvy, pneumonia,
rheumatism and accidents were common in the mining camps. Often miners would band together and
work a sick man’s claim for him the required one day a week until he was able to
resume mining himself.
In Marysville, a young man was severely injured and lost both of his
legs. He couldn’t do any kind
of work and didn’t have enough money to buy a ticket home. Two of his friends took him to a hotel
where there was an entertainer.
They put the injured man on the stage in a chair while the singer and the
violinist played and sang a song called “Not Old Dog Tray But Poor Dog
Tray”. The audience gave
generously. A ticket was purchased
and the young man was sent back to his family in the East on the next
ship.
Justice varied in California.
If an American stole a mule, he was whipped. But if a Mexican stole a mule, he was
hanged—even if there was no proof.
Negroes, Indians and Chinese were not allowed to testify in court. Greasers (people of Spanish/Indian
descent) were not accepted. (The
term greaser originated before gold was discovered. When the Spanish dons traveled from one
hacienda to another, a peon would walk behind the carriage with a bucket of
grease to grease the axle.)
Consideration for other miners did not seem to
hold if the others spoke a different language or if their skins were not
white. And in a place where there
were men from all parts of the world, this attitude led to trouble. In all too many cases, Americans took
the arrogant attitude that they had a right to push all others out of the
way.
Sometimes differences were settled fairly, even
though a big roughly, as in Rich Bar when in the summer of 1850, a group of
Frenchmen and another group of Americans arrived and started to stake out claims
at the same time. A battled
threatened for a while, but some sensible person suggested that each side pick
its best man and let the two decide who stayed and who went. The fight lasted three hours, but it was
a fair one. When the Frenchman
lost, his countrymen moved on without further argument. However the Frenchmen were ultimately
the winners because the area they moved to a short distance upstream turned out
to be the richest yet found in Rich Bar; to this day it is called French
Gulch.
More ugly, though, was the so-called French War
near Jackson where a group of French miners had opened up some rich new
claims. There was no doubt that
they had every right to stay, but the greed of some Americans was aroused. They spread the lie that the French had
raised their own flag and had openly defied the government of the United
States. Then, when the mob spirit
was high, they forcibly drove out the French and robbed them of their sites.
The same sort of thing happened much more often
to Mexicans and to miners from South America, who were called Chilenos whether
they came from Chile or any other county in Latin America. They not only spoke a different
language, they were looked down upon because their skins were swarthy. Americans argued, in an attempt to
justify their actions, that since they had just taken California away from
Mexico, the Mexicans no longer had any rights there.
Unfair taxes were specially contrived to make
things harder for the Latin Americans, and if the claims they staked happened to
pay
well, they were often driven
off them. They were robbed, beaten,
and sometimes murdered. It is not
surprising that some of them became robbers.
But even the Mexicans and Chilenos were held in
high regard compared to the Chinese.
When the first gold was found at Coloma in 1848, there were only seven
Chinamen in California; by 1850 there were at least twenty thousand and they
were coming in a flood. (American Heritage, pp. 110-111)
The Chinese were the largest
single ethnic group of miners in the west.
The Chinese, who were often called “Celestials”, suffered severe
discrimination. They were not
allowed to mine. The Chinese were
forced out of mining camps and sometimes even murdered. The Chinese were not allowed to own
property. The Chinese (like all
foreigners who arrived in San Francisco by boat) were charged a tax of $5-$10
per person to pay for medical costs that they might incur. However, the Chinese were excluded from
the city hospitals in San Francisco (which were funded by the head tax the
Chinese were forced to pay). No one
wanted to live near the Chinese.
They were ridiculed because of their clothes, queues (pigtails) and
accent. Children threw mud at
them. Caucasians wanted California
to be for Americans and felt they should get rid of the “Yellow
Peril”.
The Chinese in America have
been patronized, welcomed, lynched, despised, excluded, hated, liked, admired,
but rarely understood or simply accepted.
They have been creatures of whom stereotypes have been created. They have been pictured as wise, crafty,
honest, frugal, law-abiding, soulless.
We all know that “a Chinaman’s chance” means no chance at all. Most adults today might still remember
the rhyme:
Chink, Chink, Chinaman
sitting on a rail,
Along came a white man and
cut off his tail.
That is, fortunately, a
couplet of a bygone day. We almost
never hear “Chink” used any more and most people know that “Chinaman” has a
derogatory connotation because of the reference to “John Chinaman,” implying
that Chinese were all alike and had no individuality. (Lee, p. 129).
Some of the conflict
occurred because of the reasons the Chinese came to California. In Southern China crops had
failed and jobs were few. Families
were being forced to sell their children as slaves in order to survive. Then the Chinese heard about Gum Shan (the “Mountain of Gold”). The Chinese came to California, not as
immigrants but as sojourners—here today and gone (home) tomorrow. The typical gum san hok (Gold Mountain Guest)
would
remain in “Ka-la-fo-ne-a” no
longer than necessary. When he had
made his pile—perhaps $500—he would return home to his patient wife and family
for a life of relative ease in Kwangtung. . . . He did not want to be assimilated;
on the contrary he preferred to be insulated from the fan kwei (foreign devils) all around
him. He had one foot in Frisco but
the other was still firmly planted in Canton. His great ambition was to make a lot of
money and become a Gum San Hock—a
returnee from the Golden Hills.
While he was in San Francisco his one pressing desire was to be left
alone. . . .
Even after death the ties
with China were strong in the Chinese.
Hence the shiploads of bones and ashes of the dead which year after year
left the Embarcadero bound for Hong Kong.
For example, when the French ship Asia sailed in January, 1858, she bore
the embalmed bodies of 321 Chinese.
(Dillon, pp. 15-16
Immigration records are not clear
as to how many Chinese sojourners eventually did go home to China to
retire--certainly less than half.
Some Chinese went home every 5 years or so for a visit but returned to
America to work again. If they were
married, they left their wives and children in China. Because they saw themselves as
sojourners, the Chinese saw no real need to change their style of dress, cut
their pigtails or live like the other miners. They weren’t planning to stay. So the Chinese congregated together and
Chinatowns grew up in California.
It would appear that the growth of separate living areas in San Francisco
and the mining towns was partially a result of the attitude of the Chinese themselves
and partially because they had no other choice--no one would allow them to live
anywhere else.
The building of the transcontinental railroad brought more Chinese to
California. When Charles Crocker
needed workers to build the Central Pacific Railroad, he first hired Caucasians
but instead of working all they were after was a free ride down the track to the
Washoe Silver Mines. So then
Crocker hired Chinese workers. Ten
thousand Chinese workers were
recruited or imported to do pick and shovel and earth moving work on the
railroad. The white workers called
the Chinese “Crocker’s Pets”. When
the railroad was finished, the prediction was that the Chinese would return to
China. Although most of the Chinese
had originally came to California with the intention of returning to China, the
majority remained in California. In
fact, even more workers came from China. Some Chinese moved to the cities
where they became vegetable and fish peddlers, ran laundries or became servants.
At one time laundry had to be sent to Canton or
Honolulu. Before the Chinese came,
laundry was done by Spanish-American and Indian women who washed on the borders
of a little fresh-water lake about two miles from San Francisco. Wah Lee started the first Chinese
laundry on Washington Street. By
1876 San Francisco had three hundred Chinese laundries each employing about five
men. . . . What they did know was
that the regular price was $8 for doing a dozen shirts [and] there were very few
women in California to do this kind of work, and that at $5 a dozen they, the
Chinese, could get the business.
To economize on rent, two firms would very often
use the same premises alternating night and day around the clock. The laundrymen . . . were able to pan soapsuds and find
gold dust from dirty shirts, a bonus added to the regular price for laundry.
The old Chinese laundryman of that era sprayed
shirts from a mouthful of water, ironed night and day with a heavy iron, and was
the subject of ridicule and curiosity in the town. He tried to buy the goodwill of children
with lychee nuts, but the stories of a large chopping knife hidden under the
counter was ingrained into young minds and the image of an opium-smoking
rat-eating “Chinaman” stuck. (Lee,
p. 15)
In San Francisco, a Chinese houseboy was almost a necessity for the
affluent.
He became a part of the family, raised the
children, cooked the meals, did all the shopping and shared in the happiness and
sorrows of the family. And he was
found in almost every well-to-do- home in California in the last half of the
nineteenth century. (Lee, p.
16)
The Chinese were “a gap filler”—doing
what no one else would do. They
adapted to the white man’s customs and slipped away without protesting when the
white man wanted his job. It was
not long before the Chinese began to dominate the cigar-making, shoemaking and
clothing industries in San Francisco.
Between 1850 and 1882, there
were 100,000 Chinese men who came to California but only 8,842 Chinese women
came. Many of these women were
prostitutes. They were slaves and
had no choice about immigrating.
Few “good Chinese women” came
to California. “It was
generally against Chinese custom to bring virtuous women so far from home.”
(Dillon, p. 8) The Chinese men left
their wives behind because they planned to
return home to China themselves. Chinese immigration policy also
made it difficult for Chinese men
to bring their wives.
The Six Companies (Chinese
Immigration Companies) paid for an immigrant’s passage to America and the
immigrant paid them back in installments over a period of 6-7 months. (This was similar to the indentured
servants who came to the America colonies.) Chinese men were discouraged from
bringing their wives to America and only the wives of businessmen were allowed
to come.
No one realized at the time, and few remember
now, that Chinese labor in California during this early period developed the
resources of the state as they would not have been developed otherwise. California was dependent upon the East
for her manufactured goods and supplies which could not be delivered cheaply and
quickly. She had land but had not
irrigated it or cultivated it. She
had the perfect weather for growing fruit but she did not have the human
resources to plant it, care for it, gather it, and build a transportation system
to bring it to market. (Lee,
p. 8-9)
In 1848 blacks were among the first miners. Like other crew members, black seamen
(mainly from New England whalers) jumped ship to seek gold. Freed slaves, fugitives, and gangs of
“Negro servants” brought by Southerners increased their numbers to about two
thousand by 1852—only about 1 percent of the population of
California.
California held a powerful attraction for
blacks, who hoped that gold would enable them to buy freedom for themselves and
their families. In some instances,
slaves received their masters’ permission to leave. Their return seemed guaranteed, because
they had left their wives and children behind.
Alvin Coffey, a slave from Missouri, dug up five
thousand dollars worth of gold for his master. Then he was sold to another
Missourian. After unearthing large
profits, Coffey paid thousands of dollars to free himself, his wife, and two
daughters. James Taylor, from Ohio,
already freed by his master, managed to dig up enough to buy freedom for his
wife and seven children before he returned home.
Slaveholders from the South often brought their
staff to work in the mines. General
Thomas Jefferson Green, a rich Texan, filed claims not only in his own name, but
also in the names of his slaves.
Infuriated miners called a meeting and passed a resolution excluding
blacks from the area.
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850, providing for
the return between states of escaped slaves, was a threat to those blacks who
had found refuge in the North. Many
of them looked to California as a haven, since it was so out of the way that
their capture would be difficult.
Because California had been established as a free state, they hoped for
sympathy and under-standing.
However, “persons of color” weren’t always welcome, and they were
sometimes chased from the diggings.
Fortunately, there were [men] like Scotsman
William Downie, whose group consisted of seven blacks and two white men. They worked in harmony and were rewarded
with rich diggings. The prosperous
town of Downieveille was named in the Scotsman’s honor. (Blumberg, pp.
105-106)
Respectable women in California were hard to find. The miners pined about them and wrote
home to their families about their yearnings for “proper honest women”. Respectable women received preferential
treatment. If the miners knew that
a woman wanted to try her hand at panning for gold, many miners would “salt” the
pan in order to make sure she would “see the color”. The “non-white” women of various
nationalities who worked in the camps doing laundry and cooking did not “count”
as far as the miners were concerned.
Nor did the white girls who worked in the saloons. Only “proper, honest women” counted.
One
miner recorded in his journal that:
We were prospecting on the
north fork of Weber or Weaver Creek, twenty-five miles east of Hangtown. It was Sat; the rain had been falling
nearly all day, when Sam Hit came into camp with the joyful news that he had
heard that a white woman had come to Snow's Camp, 16 miles away. Next morning he put on his best jeans
pants his mother had made, a pair of alligator boots that he gave an ounce of
gold dust for ($18), a red flannel shirt that cost him $4 and his old wool hat,
lopped down over his ears, and struck out on foot to see such a wonderful thing
as a white woman. When he arrived,
it was late in the day, and, as Mrs. Snow kept a restaurant, he ordered dinner
at $1.50. While eating he saw some
eggs in a pan. On inquiry he
learned they were worth one dollar each, so he ordered one cooked. This brought his dinner up to
$2.50. It was dark long before he
reached camp. He had had a long,
weary walk over a steep mountain trail, and, should he live to be a hundred
years old, he says he will never forget the day he walked thirty-two miles to
see a white woman in California. “
(Hulbert, p. 316)
A HUSBAND
WANTED
BY A LADY who can wash,
cook, scour, sew, milk, spin, weave, hoe, (can’t plow), cut wood, make fires,
feed the pigs, raise chickens, rock the cradle (gold-rocker, I thank you, Sir!),
saw a plank, drive nails, etc., and as you can see, she can
write.
Her age is none of your
business. She is neither handsome
nor a fright, yet an old man need not apply. There must be $20,000 settled on her,
before she will bind herself.
(Seidman, pp. 145-146)
There is one story of American sportsmanship in
the Mother Lode country which is brightly to the credit of the swashbuckling
Forty-niners. One of the miners who
went to the gold-rush town of Weaverville was John Carr, a blacksmith. Blacksmithing proved so profitable that
soon Carr was able to leave his shop in charge of an assistant and go east to
bring out his wife. He left a few
straggly huts and tents. When he
returned a year later, Weaverville was a thriving town of two thousand, and lots
one could have had for nothing when he left were selling at eight hundred
dollars apiece. But women were
still rarer than gold. Carr brought
back with him not only his wife but his brother’s wife and another man and his
wife. The arrival of three women at
one time threw Weaverville into ecstasies.
It was decided to honor them with a ball. Tickets sold for ten dollars each. Carr records the ball as a historic
event, at which “more boiled shirts were worn. . . than ever before at
Weaverville.” But that was
because most of them were seen repeatedly.
The men owning them were generous.
Shirts were swapped all night long, so that practically every man had at
least one dance in genteel costume.
(Shipley, pp. 108-9)
As women were a rarity in the diggings, half of
the men might tie a bandanna around their arms and be the “ladies” for an
evening of dancing. No one thought
it strange to see these bearded “ladies” in heavy boots tripping seriously with
their partners through the steps of the polka. (American Heritage, p.
105)
The discovery of gold escalated the ongoing problems between the Native
American Indians and the white men.
The first genuine gold rush in American history
began in Georgia. In 1828 a slave
found gold in a river in northern Georgia, and another black man spotted gold in
a creek near Dahlonega. Then a
white named Benjamin Park picked up a stone whose deep, rich yellow color had
caught his eyes. And knew he had
found gold.
All these discoveries were made on Cherokee
land. . . By the end of the year a
gold rush was under way. Thousands
of prospectors poured into Cherokee territory with picks, pans, axes, and
rifles, destroying Indian property as they stake out claims.. . . [American’s felt that] the Indians
didn’t own the gold-rich land just because they had “seen it from the mountain
or passed it in the chase.”
No, the gold was white America’s.
So the whites grabbed the Cherokee land—and made millions out of it. (Meltzer, pp.
65-66)
There were people who were shocked at the plight
of the Indian. They protested,
wanting reforms that would enable native Americans to live in freedom, with
dignity. But the loudest, strongest
voices of the time were in favor of some solution to what was called “the Indian
problem.” Three commissioners appointed by the federal government concluded that
the choice was between “extermination or domestication” Either kill them or set them up in
reservations, where they could become civilized.
All across America Indians who were in the way
were usually sent to reservations located west of their home territory. The dilemma in California was that only
ocean was west, and it was unthinkable to send Indians east. California’s first governor, Peter H.
Burnett, stated that “a war of extermination will continue to be waged. . .
until the Indian race becomes extinct.”
During the nineteenth century thousands of Indians were hunted down and
killed. (Blumberg, p. 105)
The California Indians suffered most from the
gold rush simply because they were there.
Their lands were either in the diggings or on the roads to them. The forty-niners had little
understanding or respect for the Indian culture and way of life. Wherever and whenever Indians were in
the way, the Americans simply swept them aside. Caught up in a drive for riches, the
white men were in no mood to tolerate any opposition or to worry about whose
lands they were on, whose streams they were fouling, whose burial grounds they
were defiling. No treacherous,
ignorant savage (said they) was going to stand in the way of their pursuit of
the rainbow. White men’s disease,
white men’s greed, white men’s alcohol destroyed the Indian peoples. . .
.
Wherever a strike or discovery was made,
forty-niners poured in, and mining camps sprang up. Within a year, the Anglos outnumbered
the Indians. The Indians watched
with dismay the invasion of their territory, the slaughter of their game, and
the poisoning and polluting of their streams by mining sludge and refuse. Many of the acorn-producing oaks and
nut-bearing pines were chopped down and the timber used to build cabins, dams,
and sluices. . . .
In the mining towns and the diggings themselves,
the Indians were held in lowest esteem and treated with contempt. In 1848 they were allowed to mine either
for themselves or as laborers for white bosses. But as the mines filled up with
forty-niners arriving from the East and Oregon, the Indians were ordered off the
land and driven out. . .
The Indian culture began to change. What were luxuries and novelties at
first, began to take on importance and become necessities. Emulating the white man’s dress and
style of living, lured by the possibility of possessing things they had never
owned or desired before, the Indians became enmeshed in the digging of gold to
satisfy these new desires. They
abandoned their ancestral way of life and fell victim to artificial longings. .
.
Because their culture did
not stress accumulation and greed, the Indians were scarcely a match for the
shrewd white storekeeper or prospector, who often cheated and shortchanged them.
Relates Grimshaw: “In trading with
Indians, it was considered legitimate (even in the stores at Sutter’s Fort) to
have two sets of weights. The
Indian ounce weight was equal to two ounces standard and so on up.” (Seidman, pp.
186-189)
Copyright 1997 by Rose Owens
Focus Questions to include
in the general
discussion:
1.
Why was there conflict
between the Indians and the white man?
Was the conflict over gold lands a new and separate
issue?
2.
How do you suppose the young
handicapped man felt when he was “put on display” on the stage in order to help
raise money to send him home? Do
similar situations occur today?
3.
Why do you think traveling
to California and working in the mines changed people? How did they
change?
4.
What reasons can you think
of to explain why there was little or no conflict in
the summer of
1848 in the mining towns and lots more after that?
5.
What solutions might have
helped the different nationalities get along better in the mining towns? Would any of these solutions help people
of different nationalities get along better?
6.
Why were “good, honest
women” valued in the gold fields?
BIBLIOGRAPHY
American Heritage editors,
The California Gold Rush, American Heritage Publishing Co., Inc., New
York, 1961.
Blumberg, Rhoda, The
Great American Gold Rush, Bradbury Press, New York,
1989.
Chidsey, Donald Barr, The
California Gold Rush, Crown Publishers, Inc., New York.
Dillon, Richard H., The
Hatchet Men: The Story of the Tong Wars in San Francisco Chinatown,
Coward-McCann, Inc., New York, 1962.
Hulburt, Archer Butler,
Forty-Niners: The Chronicle of the California Trail, Little, Brown, and
Company, Boston, 1931.
Krensky, Stephen,
Striking It Rich: The Story of the California Gold Rush, Simon and
Schuster Books for Young Readers, NY, 1966.
Lee, Calvin, Chinatown,
USA, Doubleday & Company, Inc., New York, 1965.
Loftis, Anne,
California—Where the Twain Did Meet, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New
York, 1973.
Meltzer, Milton,
Gold, Harper Collins Publishers.
Seidman, Laurence I., The
Fools of ’49: The California Gold Rush, 1848-1856, Alfred A. Knopf, New York,
1976.
Shipley, Lee, It’s an Old California Custom,
The Vanguard Press, Inc., New York, 1948.